The world of online education and digital media often crosses paths with debates, misunderstandings, and controversies. Recently, a dispute between Kumar Sir (Kumar Edutainment) and popular digital media house Lallantop has attracted attention across YouTube and social media platforms.
The issue revolves around a video where Lallantop allegedly claimed that Kumar Sir spread “fake news” regarding the Indian messaging app Arattai. In response, Kumar Sir came live on YouTube to clarify his stand. His video has opened up a discussion on how teachers, influencers, and media outlets should interact in the age of social media.
This article takes a closer look at the Kumar Sir and Lallantop controversy, analyzes both sides, and tries to answer the question — Who is right?
Table of Contents
Who is Kumar Sir?
Kumar Sir, the face behind Kumar Edutainment, is a teacher and motivator widely known on YouTube for his passionate teaching style. His videos often go viral because of his energetic delivery, motivational tone, and straightforward advice to students preparing for competitive exams.
Unlike traditional teachers, he blends teaching with life lessons. Sometimes he scolds students, sometimes he motivates them like a friend or elder brother. As he himself explained, his intention is never to insult or humiliate anyone, but to push students toward discipline and focus.
His coaching app, Kumar Edutainment App, provides affordable courses for as little as ₹100–₹150 — a fraction of the cost students usually spend on exam applications or coaching classes.
Who is Lallantop?
Lallantop is a well-known Hindi news and digital media platform with millions of subscribers on YouTube. Founded by journalist Saurabh Dwivedi, it has earned a reputation for mixing news with entertainment in a way that appeals to younger audiences.
From politics to pop culture, and from ground reports to internet trends, Lallantop covers everything. Naturally, when memes of Kumar Sir went viral — particularly clips where he loudly says, “Leave IAS preparation” — Lallantop discussed him on their platform.
What Triggered the Controversy?
The spark came from a Lallantop video in which their team allegedly claimed that Kumar Sir had spread “fake news” about Arattai App.
According to their take, Kumar Sir suggested in one of his motivational videos that platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube could one day start charging heavy subscription fees. He then promoted Arattai, an Indian-made app by Zoho Corporation, as an alternative.
Lallantop presented this claim as an example of misinformation. Their thumbnail reportedly stated:
“On Arattai App, teacher spread fake news.”
This portrayal did not sit well with Kumar Sir. He felt his intentions were misunderstood and his reputation as a teacher was wrongly questioned. As a result, he decided to go live on YouTube to share his side of the story.
Kumar Sir’s Clarification
In his live session, Kumar Sir addressed his viewers directly. Here are the main points he clarified:
1. Not Fake News, But a Hypothetical Example
He explained that his statement about WhatsApp or other global apps charging fees was a hypothetical situation. He never claimed it as a confirmed fact. His purpose was to show how foreign apps create dependency and how this dependency could harm users if charges were imposed in the future.
By promoting Arattai, he wanted to encourage students and the public to support Indian technology companies. He emphasized that he did not take any money for promoting Arattai.
2. His Teaching Style
Kumar Sir defended the viral clips where he appeared to shout at students or ask them to “leave IAS preparation.”
According to him:
- He does not scold students to insult them, but to motivate them to stay serious about their career.
- Many of his videos are scripted motivational sessions, not real-time classroom scolding.
- Like parents sometimes raise their voice to correct children, he also raises his voice to push students toward discipline.
He insisted that his intention is always positive, not negative.
3. Respect for Lallantop
Despite feeling misrepresented, Kumar Sir maintained a respectful tone towards Lallantop and its founder, Saurabh Dwivedi.
He addressed the journalist as “bhaiya” (elder brother) multiple times, apologized if any of his words hurt them, and even said he would happily meet and hug them in the future without any bitterness.
This shows he wanted clarity, not conflict.
4. Low-Cost Education
Kumar Sir also pointed out that while media houses highlighted his viral clips, they ignored the fact that he offers high-quality courses at extremely low prices.
For just ₹100–₹150, students can access his courses for an entire year — something rare in the coaching industry. He compared this to the government’s exam form fees, which can go up to ₹800 or more.
His underlying message was: Instead of calling me controversial, why not highlight the affordable education I provide?
Lallantop’s Perspective
On the other side, Lallantop’s job as a media outlet is to critically analyze viral content.
From their angle:
- Kumar Sir’s claim about WhatsApp potentially charging Indian users could be interpreted as fear-mongering or misinformation, especially when millions of students watch his videos.
- As a responsible media platform, they felt it was necessary to highlight this and caution viewers.
- The use of memes and viral clips was likely aimed at making their content engaging for viewers.
However, the way they framed their video — particularly the thumbnail claiming “fake news” — may have been seen as too harsh by Kumar Sir and his followers.
Who is Right: Kumar Sir or Lallantop?
The Kumar Sir and Lallantop controversy is not about who is completely right or wrong, but about how messages are interpreted in the digital age.
- Kumar Sir’s Side:
He spoke about foreign apps and dependency in a motivational, hypothetical sense. His goal was to encourage people to support an Indian alternative like Arattai. He insists it was not fake news but a way of creating awareness. - Lallantop’s Side:
As a news platform, they are cautious about anything that may sound misleading to millions of users. By labeling it as “fake news,” they may have been protecting their viewers, but perhaps without fully considering Kumar Sir’s broader context.
In truth, both sides have valid points:
- Kumar Sir is correct that his purpose was motivational, not deceptive.
- Lallantop is correct that facts and claims on large platforms should be precise, as they can easily be misunderstood.
The controversy highlights the importance of responsible communication from both teachers and media.
The Bigger Picture: Lessons from the Dispute
The debate between Kumar Sir and Lallantop carries broader lessons for online educators, media platforms, and students:
- Clarity in Communication:
Teachers and influencers must ensure that hypothetical statements are clearly framed as “possibilities” or “examples,” so they are not mistaken as facts. - Balanced Media Coverage:
Media houses should present viral moments with context, instead of reducing them to sensational headlines or thumbnails. - Constructive Dialogue:
Both sides showed restraint in this case. Kumar Sir responded respectfully, and Lallantop did not escalate beyond their original video. This sets a positive example compared to many online spats that turn ugly. - Promoting Indian Apps:
Regardless of the controversy, Kumar Sir’s call to promote Indian technology deserves attention. Supporting homegrown apps like Arattai could reduce dependency on global tech giants.
Public Reaction
Viewers of the live session largely supported Kumar Sir, praising his humility and clarity. Many students believe that while his style is unconventional, his heart is in the right place.
At the same time, some also agreed that influencers and teachers with large followings should be extra careful with their words, as students often take them literally.
The controversy has, in a way, increased attention for both sides:
- Kumar Sir gained sympathy and stronger bonding with his students.
- Lallantop sparked debates and engagement around the issue.
Final Word: Moving Beyond Controversy
In the end, the Kumar Sir and Lallantop controversy may not really be about fake news or Arattai App at all. It is about how messages travel in today’s digital world.
A teacher’s motivational example can be misunderstood as a fact. A media outlet’s sharp headline can be taken as a personal attack. Between these two, the public forms its own perception.
The most positive outcome is that both Kumar Sir and Lallantop have not turned this into a bitter fight. Instead, Kumar Sir clarified with respect, and Lallantop has not responded aggressively.
This maturity is important in India’s growing ecosystem of digital education and digital media. Students, teachers, and journalists alike can learn from this — clarity, respect, and responsibility must go hand in hand.
Conclusion
The dispute between Kumar Sir and Lallantop is a reminder of the challenges in the age of viral content.
- Kumar Sir’s main message was to motivate people to support Indian apps and reduce dependency on foreign platforms.
- Lallantop’s main concern was the spread of misinformation to the masses.
- Both perspectives have merit, and both deserve respect.
At the end of the day, the question “Who is right?” may not have a simple answer. But one thing is clear: both Kumar Sir and Lallantop play an important role in shaping how India learns and thinks in the digital age.
If they meet one day — as Kumar Sir warmly suggested — perhaps this controversy will end not in conflict, but in a handshake and a lesson in unity.
Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in the articles, reports, and opinion pieces published on this website are solely those of the respective authors and contributors. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy and reliability of the information provided, the website and its publishers make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the content. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk. The website shall not be held liable for any loss, damage, or inconvenience arising from the use of or reliance on this information. All trademarks, names, and images belong to their respective owners.
